IngredientsSubstance reference

Caffeine

Other EUEFSAUSNIH ODS 10 products in Stacky

What the European Food Safety Authority and the United States National Institutes of Health have published about caffeine intake, and what the catalogue records. Reference figures and citations only.

Stacky is an organisational tool, not a medical device. It does not provide medical advice, and nothing on this page says what caffeine does. Talk to a doctor or pharmacist before starting, stopping or changing what you take.

Published intake references

Each figure is one authority’s published value, with the kind of figure and the people it applies to as that authority stated them. Where the EU and the US differ, both are shown and neither is averaged or converted. Only a tolerable upper intake level sets a ceiling. A recommended or adequate intake is context, not a limit.

EUEuropean Union — EFSA

No upper limit established by this authority None established EFSA has established no Dietary Reference Value (PRI/AI) and no Tolerable Upper Intake Level for this substance. It is not a nutrient in EFSA's DRV or UL programme, which covers vitamins, essential minerals and macronutrients. Caffeine is not a nutrient…Our record of this statement is cut short; the authority’s document has it in full. EUEFSA

USUnited States — NIH ODS / IOM

No upper limit established by this authority None established The IOM/NASEM Dietary Reference Intakes process has established no RDA, AI or Tolerable Upper Intake Level for this substance. It is not covered by the DRI framework, which addresses vitamins, elements and macronutrients. Caffeine has no DRI. (The us fda…Our record of this statement is cut short; the authority’s document has it in full. USNIH ODS

“None established” means that authority examined caffeine and set no upper limit. What it published instead is below, with its own label.

Also published, and not a limit

EUEFSA: daily intake that does not raise safety concerns 400 mg EFSA Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015; EFSA Journal 13(5):4102): 'Intakes up to 400 mg per day (about 5.7 mg/kg bw per day) consumed throughout the day do not raise safety concerns for healthy adults in the general population, except pregnant women.' Separately, 'single doses of caffeine up to 200 mg (about 3 mg/kg bw) from all sources do not raise safety concerns for the general healthy adult population.' EFSA explicitly does not call these a Tolerable Upper Intake Level, they are levels that 'do not raise safety concerns', not a UL and not a DRV. EUEFSA

These are the authority’s own words for a figure that is not a tolerable upper intake level. The app never compares a dose against one; this page prints it because the authority did.

To cite a figure, cite the authority’s document linked on its card, and this page as where you read it: stacky-app.com/substances/caffeine, retrieved 13 November 2026. Every card has its own address: add #eu-none_established-1 to the page URL for the first one.

How it is recorded

What the app records so it can schedule a dose. None of it is advice.

No form, time of day or food note is recorded for caffeine yet.

Recorded interactions

How Stacky summarises what a named source says about caffeine taken alongside another substance: absorption and nutrient status only. The category and the summary are Stacky’s words; each row links to the source, and the source’s own wording governs. A row without one is not published, and neither is one whose source description names a disease or clinical condition. None of these says whether a combination is good or bad.

Stacky’s categorySummary, in Stacky’s wordsSource
Reduces absorption or status of Calcium Net absorption of dietary calcium is reduced to a small extent by caffeine intake.
Scope the source gave: described as a small effect on net absorption.
NIH ODS
Checked 6 Aug 2026

Indexed studies

A study reaches this page only if its own title names Caffeine or one of its recorded alternative names, and does not name a disease or clinical condition. The second rule removes papers that are about caffeine; a title naming a condition beside a substance reads as a claim, and this page makes none. Titles are the studies’ own words, newest first. A study being listed is not a statement that caffeine does what it set out to test. How this list is built →

TitleJournalYearReference
The Effect of Creatine Nitrate and Caffeine Individually or Combined on Exercise Performance and Cognitive Function: A Randomized, Crossover, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2024 PubMed 38542677
Effects of Caffeine Intake on Endurance Running Performance and Time to Exhaustion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2022 PubMed 36615805
International society of sports nutrition position stand: caffeine and exercise performance. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2021 PubMed 33388079

Showing 3 of the 5 papers indexed against caffeine in Stacky.

About this page

Stacky is a supplement tracking app. It renders what you take and what published sources say about it; it does not tell you what to take. Every figure on this page names the authority that published it and links to that authority’s own page.

Not on this page: a dose of our own, a grade, a verdict on whether caffeine works, or any statement that it treats, prevents or improves a condition. How these pages are built →

Figures are read from the authorities’ published tables and can go out of date when those tables are revised. If one here is wrong, tell us at support@stacky-app.com and we will check it against the source.